Febrile child

  • PIC logo
    PIC Endorsed
  • See also

    Fever and suspected or confirmed neutropenia 
    Kawasaki disease
    Petechiae and purpura 
    Sepsis - assessment and management 
    Local antimicrobial guidelines
    Prolonged fever

    Key points

    1. Febrile neonates ≤21 days (corrected age): require a full septic work-up (FBE, CRP, blood, urine and CSF cultures ± CXR) and empiric IV antibiotics, regardless of clinical appearance or initial blood results
    2. Febrile infants 22–28 days (corrected age): are slightly lower risk. If well-appearing with low-risk inflammatory markers, they still require admission, but lumbar puncture and empiric antibiotics may be deferred
    3. Febrile infants <3 months (corrected age): need a lower threshold for investigation and treatment than older children. They may be discharged after observation if a source is identified, they remain clinically well, inflammatory markers are reassuring, and follow-up is arranged
    4. In an unwell child, viral symptoms or a positive respiratory viral test should not solely be assumed to explain fever, as serious bacterial infection may coexist

    Background

    • Fever is defined as a body temperature of 38.0C
    • Most febrile illnesses in children are caused by viral infections, however careful assessment is required to exclude a serious bacterial infection (SBI)
    • Urinary tract infection is the most common SBI, followed by pneumonia. Other important SBIs in children include sepsis, meningitis, bone and joint infections, skin and soft tissue infections and mastoiditis
    • Unvaccinated children with fever who look unwell are at significantly greater risk of SBI and should be treated as sepsis
    • The severity of illness cannot be predicted by the degree of fever, or its response to antipyretics. The child's age, appearance and behaviour are better indicators of serious illness (see Traffic light system for identifying risk of serious illness below)
    • Children with fever for ≥4 days should be assessed for Kawasaki disease / PIMS-TS. For children with fever for >7 days without a source, refer to Prolonged fever

    Assessment

    History

    • Fever timeline
    • Localising symptoms: cough, headache, photophobia, diarrhoea, vomiting, abdominal pain, urinary changes, rash, musculoskeletal pain or reduced limb movement
    • High-risk groups: neonates, unvaccinated children, immunocompromised children (secondary to a medical condition or immunosuppressive medications such as steroids, chemotherapy), children with central venous access devices, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children
    • Immunisation history
    • Current or recent antibiotic use
    • Sick contacts
    • Oral intake, urine output
    • Overseas travel (See Fever in the recently returned traveller)

    Note: Fever should not be attributed solely to teething or recent vaccination in an unwell child, and SBI should be considered

    Red flag features

    • High level of parental concern
    • Representation within 48 hours
    • Clinical deterioration despite previous treatment
    • Recent surgery or burns
    • Unwell children from high-risk group (see above)

    Examination

    All children should have a thorough clinical examination to identify a source of infection and assess for concerning features suggestive of SBI

    Traffic light system for identifying risk of serious illness

    Clinically well appearing child Clinically unwell appearing child
    Category

    Low risk (no unwell features)

    Intermediate risk

    High risk

    Colour Normal colour Pallor reported by parent/ carer Pallor, mottled
    Cyanosed
    Activity

    Normal response to social cues

    Content, smiles

    Stays awake or awakens easily

    Strong cry or not crying

    Older child: Normal activity

    Poor smile/ response to social cues

    Decreased activity

    Wakes only with prolonged stimulation

    Older child: Lethargic
    No response to social cues

    Does not wake or if roused does not stay awake

    Weak, high-pitched or continuous cry

    Older child: altered mental state or behaviour
    Breathing Normal effort of breathing Tachypnoea (Range for physiological variables)

    SpO2 <92%

    Increased work of breathing
    Crepitations on auscultation
    Grunting

    Apnoea

    SpO2 <90%
    Circulation / Hydration Normal skin and eyes

    Moist mucous membranes
    Tachycardia (Range for physiological variables)

    CRT ≥ 3 seconds

    Reduced urine output

    Signs of dehydration
    Persistent, unexplained tachycardia

    Hypotension

    Cool peripheries
    Other No Intermediate or high-risk features

    Not from the high-risk groups (see history)
    Rigors

    Swelling of a limb or joint

    Non-weight bearing limb/ not using an extremity

    Hypothermia (T <36 °C)

    Parent or carer concern that child is behaving differently from usual
    Non-blanching petechial or purpuric rash

    Status epilepticus, focal seizures, focal neurological signs, neck stiffness, bulging fontanelle

    Appears unwell to a healthcare professional
    High level of parental concern that child is deteriorating
    Adapted from: Suspected sepsis in under 16s NICE Guideline 2025

    Investigation and management

    • Guided by age, clinical appearance (see table above), and whether a source of infection is identified
    • Febrile children with high-risk features, or multiple intermediate-risk features, should be reviewed by a senior clinician. Higher risk warrants a lower threshold to treat as suspected sepsis, regardless of fever degree
    • In intermediate risk children, it is preferable to complete investigations for an infective focus before starting antibiotics
    • In remote settings where limited access to investigation might delay care, it is safer to start antibiotics empirically while working the child up for the cause of fever
    • Well-appearing neonates with only suspected, tactile or infrared-recorded fever may be suitable for a period of close observation before proceeding to a full septic work-up
    • UTI is the leading cause of SBI and is particularly common among non-toilet-trained children. Urine collection and testing should be performed if there is no clinically obvious focus (See Additional notes below)
    • When blood cultures are indicated, ensure adequate volume is collected (see Additional notes below)

    Antimicrobial recommendations may vary according to local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns; please refer to local guidelines

    Herpes simplex virus (HSV)

    • Disseminated HSV presents most commonly in the first 6 weeks of life
    • Clinical features of HSV disease include sepsis presentation, vesicular rash (absent in 30%), seizures, encephalopathy, hypothermia, mucous membrane ulceration
    • Laboratory features of disseminated HSV include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, deranged LFTs, coagulopathy
    • A negative maternal history of genital HSV does not rule out neonatal infection, as most affected mothers are unaware of their status until the infant's diagnosis
    • If concerned, perform HSV PCR testing on blood, CSF and skin lesion samples and commence treatment with aciclovir

    Infants ≤21 days corrected age

    • Assess promptly for signs of sepsis and discuss with senior clinician. See Recognition of the seriously unwell neonate and young infant
    • FBE, CRP, blood culture, urine MCS by suprapubic aspirate (SPA). For other methods of urine collection: see Urine collection below, lumbar puncture (LP) for CSF studies (see Lumbar puncture), ± CXR
    • Prompt treatment with empiric antibiotics
    • If the infant is clinically unwell or investigations are delayed, start antibiotics and aciclovir immediately. Use the IV or intraosseous route, especially if unwell. Reserve the IM route for clinically well neonates with difficult venous access

    Infants 22 days - 3 months corrected age

    febrile chlid CPG_flowchart1


    Children >3 months corrected age

    febrile chlid CPG_flowchart2


    Consider consultation with local paediatric team when

    • Unwell child or septic shock
    • Infants <28 days corrected age with fever
    • High-risk child (see history)
    • Prolonged fever of unclear cause
    • Barriers to follow-up within 24 hours due to social or external factors (consider admission)

    Consider transfer when

    Child requires care above the level of comfort of the local hospital

    For emergency advice and paediatric or neonatal ICU transfers, see Retrieval Services

    Consider discharge when

    • Infants ≤28 days: All infants are admitted. For infants who were well appearing at presentation, consider discharge when the blood culture is negative at 36 hours. Studies in infants under 90 days have found that over 96% of blood cultures are positive within 36 hours
    • Infants 29 days - 3 months of corrected age: well-appearing, investigations normal, reviewed by senior clinician, follow-up has been arranged within 24-48 hours with local GP, paediatric acute review, or virtual care clinic
    • Children >3 months corrected age: well-appearing, follow up has been arranged

    Always advise parents to return for review if the child is deteriorating or they are worried

    Parent information

    Fever in children

    Additional notes

    Recommended temperature measurement

    • Axillary (<3 months): Placed over axillary artery for 3 minutes
    • Tympanic temperature (>3 months)
    • Skin/Infrared thermometers: unreliable, not recommended
    • Rectal (neonates): Screen with axillary first, use rectal only if fever is still suspected

    LP (See Lumbar puncture)

    • When indicated, should be performed without delay and, ideally, before the administration of antibiotics
    • Contraindications include impaired conscious state, haemodynamic instability, focal neurological signs and impaired coagulation. In this circumstance, treatment for meningitis/encephalitis should be commenced and an LP performed when the child is stable and there are no contraindications

    Urine collection (See Urinary tract infection)

    • SPA (see Suprapubic aspirate): Gold standard in children up to 6 months (low risk of contamination) 
    • In/out catheter: useful if the bladder is underfilled, such as after a failed clean catch or SPA (discard first few drops of urine if possible, to reduce contamination) (low-medium risk of contamination). See Indwelling urinary catheter - insertion and ongoing care
    • Midstream urine (MSU): preferred method for toilet-trained children who can void on request (medium risk of contamination)
    • Clean catch: appropriate for pre-continent children who cannot void on request, but are not seriously unwell (medium risk of contamination) 
    • Bag urine: not recommended for culture due to high false positive rates (high risk of contamination) 
    • Specify method of collection on pathology request 

    Note: The perineal/genital area should be cleaned with saline-soaked gauze for 10 seconds before collecting midstream or clean catch urine

    Blood culture

    • Blood cultures should be taken using an aseptic technique
    • The sensitivity of blood cultures improves with larger blood volumes, although there is an upper limit to the optimal blood-to-broth ratio
    • Ideal volumes for blood culture collection:
      • Neonates: target volume 1 mL, paediatric specific bottle (minimum 0.5 mL)
      • Children <20 kg: 2-4 mL, paediatric specific bottle
      • Children >20 kg: 5-10 mL x2, in aerobic and anaerobic bottles
        • Inoculate aerobic bottle preferentially, eg if inadequate volume for both bottles (ie <10 mL)
        • If inadequate volume for aerobic bottle, ie <5 mL, use paediatric specific bottle

    Last updated October 2026

  • Reference List

    1. Alejandre C, Guitart C, Balaguer M, Torrus I, Bobillo-Perez S, Cambra FJ, et al. Use of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of bacterial infection in infants with severe bronchiolitis. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2021;180(3):833-42.
    2. Biondi EA, Lee B, Ralston SL, Winikor JM, Lynn JF, Dixon A, et al. Prevalence of Bacteremia and Bacterial Meningitis in Febrile Neonates and Infants in the Second Month of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2(3):e190874.
    3. Bonadio W, Huang F, Nateson S, Okpalaji C, Kodsi A, Sokolovsky S, et al. Meta-analysis to Determine Risk for Serious Bacterial Infection in Febrile Outpatient Neonates With RSV Infection. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2016;32(5):286-9.
    4. Craig JC, Williams GJ, Jones M, Codarini M, Macaskill P, Hayen A, et al. The accuracy of clinical symptoms and signs for the diagnosis of serious bacterial infection in young febrile children: prospective cohort study of 15 781 febrile illnesses. BMJ. 2010;340:c1594.
    5. Dodd SR, Lancaster GA, Craig JV, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. In a systematic review, infrared ear thermometry for fever diagnosis in children finds poor sensitivity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2006;59(4):354-7.
    6. Elkhunovich MA, Wang VJ, Pham P, Arpilleda JC, Clingenpeel JM, Mansour K, et al. Assessing the Utility of Urine Testing in Febrile Infants 2 to 12 Months of Age With Bronchiolitis. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2019;03:03.
    7. Fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management. NICE guideline 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng143 (viewed 5th September 2022).
    8. Gomez B, Mintegi S, Bressan S, Da Dalt L, Gervaix A, Lacroix L, et al. Validation of the "Step-by-Step" Approach in the Management of Young Febrile Infants. 2016.
    9. Hsiao AL, Baker MD. Fever in the new millennium: a review of recent studies of markers of serious bacterial infection in febrile children. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 2005;17(1):56-61.
    10. Irwin AD, Wickenden J, Le Doare K, Ladhani S, Sharland M. Supporting decisions to increase the safe discharge of children with febrile illness from the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2016;101(3):259-66.